case western reserve university law school ranking Things To Know Before You Buy
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were very well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsAppThe main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all guarantee law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
14. Inside the light with the position explained earlier mentioned, it can be concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be deemed for no fault of his have and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Usually, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes Individuals in obvious violation of proven case legislation) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case is not appealed, the decision will stand.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will acquire care of all of the areas of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents on the boy or Lady never approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that although thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the advantage of every one of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored via the respondent department just to extend favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to click here re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a negative link or possibly a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.